One of the critical competencies a seafarer needs is situational awareness, being alert to his or her environment and being able to analyze the situation and make informed decisions.
A formal definition:
The
term situational awareness can be defined as how elements are viewed within
their surroundings, relative to time and space, and how to foresee or predict
the occurrence of events by understanding trends and patterns.[1]
Lack of this competence can lead to navigational errors
that can be disastrous.
A survey of practising seafarers using a bridge simulator
found that over 50% of them failed to recognise a navigational fault even when
there were audio and visual cues[2].
A report by the Norwegian Maritime safety authority into
a recent collision between a Norwegian warship and a tanker off the Norwegian
coast had several safety recommendations. One of these (Marine No 2019/06T)
stated:
«The
navigator in charge did not pick up on the signals of danger or that the
navigator’s own situational awareness was inaccurate. A more experienced
navigator would have been better equipped to realise this. »[3]
So what is situational
awareness? Let’s use a deck officer on watch as an example.
Many scholars break it
down into three levels in sequence.
1.
The perception of the elements in the
current environment means that a navigator can identify ships and objects
around him or her, can identify alarms or signals on the bridge.
2.
Comprehension of the situation meaning
that the navigator understands the situation and the likely risks involved.
3.
A decision-making phase where the
navigator acts in response to the perceived risk.
An example helps clarify
the principles.
It is nighttime and the
navigator is in maritime traffic and identifies a ship approaching. Either by
radar or visually he ascertains that there is the likelihood of a collision.
The classic «end on» scenario. Once understood it is the navigator’s responsibility
to make a decision following the International Collision regulations and alter
course to starboard to avoid the oncoming vessel. That way the risk of a
collision is averted.
This is a simplified
version and there can be many factors that can make the situation more complex
such as limited manoeuvrability, fatigue or lack of competence of the
navigator. Nevertheless situational awareness practice is central to the
operation and inability to understand what is happening around the navigator is
a major cause of human error accidents at sea.
The navigator is not always alone on the ridge but works in a team utilising the tools of bridge resource management where situational awareness is a key component.
[4]There
is another dimension to situational awareness that should not be discounted.
Ones senses. It may be that as Captain in your cabin on an ocean crossing you
hear a change in the background noise of engine, wind and waves. This alerts to
a new situation, either planned or not. The change in motion of the ship would
be another source of concern. Differentiating the sound of one alarm from
another can be critical in decision-making.
So the senses also play
an important role in situational awareness.
References
‘2019-08 KNM Helge
Ingstad Og Sola TS Eng (1).Pdf’, n.d.
Chan, Jevon P., Rose
Norman, Kayvan Pazouki, and David Golightly. ‘Autonomous Maritime Operations
and the Influence of Situational Awareness within Maritime Navigation’. WMU
Journal of Maritime Affairs 21, no. 2 (1 June 2022): 121–40.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-022-00264-4.
Knudsen, Anne.
‘Bridge Resource Management (BRM/MRM) | Definition’. NaviMinds (blog), 6
December 2023. https://naviminds.com/bridge-resource-management/.
[1] Chan et al., ‘Autonomous Maritime Operations and
the Influence of Situational Awareness within Maritime Navigation’, 4.
[2] Chan et al., page 138.
[3] ‘2019-08
KNM Helge Ingstad Og Sola TS Eng (page 148).Pdf’.
[4] Knudsen, ‘Bridge Resource Management (BRM/MRM) |
Definition’.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Lets see what you think!