A feast of traditional Yorkshire food

 Like all food, regional diversity in Yorkshire is no exception.

 Of course, everyone knows about Yorkshire puddings, or do they?

A Yorkshire pudding is not some soggy sponge like batter that you eat with your

Sunday roast, but a light, fluffy, crispy cup like dough that is filled with gravy.

A real insult to a Yorkshire person is to serve the Yorkshire pudding with the main course. It should be eaten alone as a starter. The reason for this is pure Yorkshire. Fill ’em up with Yorkshire pudding and they won't want as much main course! Thriftiness is a Yorkshire trait always to be followed!

Of course, if you come from Nottinghamshire, you would eat your Yorkshire pudding with jam as a dessert. But then again, they're really daft from down there!

A variation on the Yorkshire pudding is “toad in the hole”, a large Yorkshire pudding with sausage embedded in the mix. Very filling.

Then there are kippers, another essentially Yorkshire fish delicacy. In my youth, my brother and I would visit Whitby., walk across the bridge to the east side to buy kippers from Nobles, the fishmonger. You know you're in the right area because there were those sheds emitting a lot of smoke, the curing houses. A kipper, for the uninitiated, is a smoked herring. It is gutted, flattened out and hung up to smoke.

We ate ours for breakfast, best poached and sometimes with the poached on top. Delicious.

Another Yorkshire rarity is the pikelet, which in the south they call a crumpet. It is a griddle bread made from flour., water and yeast. Like a pancake but thicker and full of holes. Best toasted and loaded with butter as a breakfast delight.

 Then there is Yorkshire Brack, a moist fruit cake not unlike English Christmas

cake. But with a difference. The dried fruit are first soaked in Yorkshire tea not alcohol before mixing and baking to produce a fruit loaf.

 

 

 

 

What about Yorkshire tea, blended in Harrogate and producing a strong cuppa.

Finally, Yorkshire, like many northern regions, likes afternoon tea.

It is a meal around 4:00 PM served in many hotels and especially tea rooms. Those special afternoon cafes offering cafes offering cakes, pikelets and the final

Yorkshire Delight, the Curd Cheesecake. Sometimes called Yorkshire Curd Tart. Made of fresh curd and including currants and egg, it tops off a fine afternoon tea.

Enjoy.

The irritation of getting old

 You know yourself, that you are getting older. Your knees do not work as they used to. They're not as flexible, for example going downstairs you need to hold onto the rail. You are short of breath if you attempt to run, I should say hobble to catch the bus.

Worse still you notice you do not have the physical strength that you had, and you start to have arthritic pain in your shoulders and fingers.

Such is your state now!

You are mentally sharp although your short-term memories come and go. You tire more quickly, and afternoon siesta has become a welcome break. You accept all of this; you have to as there is little you can do about it!

Adapt to survive has become your watchword.

Add extra time to reach the bus, Do physical work in shorter periods with plenty of rest time.  It works.

 But it is not your discovery of how your body ages which is the most annoying. It is how people change their behaviour towards you that becomes most irritating.

You must be tired, why don't you take a nap. That's too heavy for you to lift. Think of your knees. These statements are meant in good faith, but firmly place you in the category of old!

Your younger colleagues do not seem to be so available, often excusing themselves. Your offspring are weary of your opinions, you are old fashioned, Dad, you don't understand!

Amongst your peers, the topic of conversation often ends up on health issues. How many times you must go to the toilet in the night. Should you be concerned about pains in the arms. Have you tried natural health prescriptions for cholesterol, etc etc.

 Are we returning to our childhood when everything was better!

 Oh dear, what a predicament.

Seafarer training

 A changing scene

In a previous article I wrote on the way that technology has changed the nature of shipping and brought new demands for training. Now we face a new technological challenge in the form of digitalisation and decarboniisation for shipping[1] and this will lead to new demands for training of seafarers.

Where should that training come from?

The International Maritime Organisation has always set the “minimum safety standards” for the operationf of ships under its conventions, particularly the four main conventions:

1.       The Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Convention,

2.       The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL),

3.       The Convention for Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping for Seafarers

4.       The Maritime Labor Convention.

Ratified by maritime nations it is left to the individual Maritime national authorities to implement and enforce the conventions. Maritime training institutions offer courses in compliance with the IMO conventions. IMO vets and monitors compliance with these standards but it is left to the national maritime authority to enforce them.

Another way that standards are monitored is throught Port State Control. This an inspection service of a maritime nation to check that foreign ships visiting their ports meet the standards set by IMO under its conventions. It is in recognition that not all flag states registering ships maintain these minimum standards of compliance. This has been particualr concern over some “flags of convenience"

It is a truism that technological change often precedes the demand for training to meet the technological challenge and the maritime sector is no exception. Whilst IMO provides the regulatory framework in which training is formed and some training guidelines it is the industry through classification socieiteis and national maritime training organisations that develop and implement training.

This has led to concern over the ability of the industry to keep pace with training requirements. The seminal report by the WMU[2] highlights the challenge.

One example provided within this report’s many valuable case studies, is of ferry workers who are expected to know how to safely charge and discharge a new battery system fitted on board their vessel. However, they find their training institution unable to keep up with the technological advances and its faculty unable to offer training courses on the new equipment’s safe use. Furthermore, the workers felt under such pressure to make sailing schedules that they didn’t have enough time to familiarize themselves with the new equipment.[3]

An upgrade of the global maritime training sector seems necessary.

A DNV report survey of seafarers showed[4][5]

that particularly officers felt they needed more training to meet the coming technological challenge and that the current IMO STCW training was insufficient to meet their needs.

For the two most urgent technological demands, digitalisation and decarbonisation there is a clear need for better IMO  based courses and the overall seafaring training model  embedded in MET (Maritime education and training) offered by academic and training institutions needs to adapt to these changing demands but remain based on general maritime subjects leaving the specialised technology training to training centres and operators.[6]

Looking further ahead, the automation of ships is leading to fully unmanned vessels operated by remote assistance from shore-based service centres. This will have a huge effect on manning and control of ships.[7]

MASS(Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships) has been the subject of scrutiny by IMO for some time and have highlighted 4 degrees of autonomy from shipboard seafarers controlling the use of automation to rmotely operated vessels without shipboard staff.[8]

Clearly the training demand will vary substantially and add further pressure for a revitalised education and training regime.

---

[1] ‘DNV_Future_of_Seafarers_Report_web (1).Pdf’.

[2] World Maritime University et al., ‘Transport 2040’.

[3] World Maritime University et al.  page 8

[4] ‘DNV_Future_of_Seafarers_Report_web (1).Pdf’. Page 38 and page 40

[5] ‘Course - Ship Technology - TN203511 - NTNU’.

[6] ‘DNV_Future_of_Seafarers_Report_web (1).Pdf’. page 42

[7] World Maritime University, ‘Transport 2040’. Page 52

[8] ‘Autonomous Shipping’.

Maritime technological development

 Technology has been a major game changer in maritime affairs for thousands of years. Maritime historians recognise significant periods when the development of shipping and its global expansion has taken place.[1] From propulsion changes from rowing to sail, from construction methods that enabled larger vessels to be built and improvements in the navigation methods that led historians to label periods such as the age of discovery and the age of navigation.[2][3]

In later periods too technology has enabled major advances in shipping.

The Industrial Revolution at the end of the 1800’s was such a period when in a relatively short period of time massive changes in shipping took place.

Stopford^[4] summarises the development such:

“Between 1833 and 1914 every aspect of ship design changed. The hull grew from 176ft. to 901ft and gross tonnage from 137 tons to 45,647 tons. Hull construction switched from wood to iron in the 1850s, from iron to steel in the 1880s, paddle propulsion was replaced in the 1880’s by screws driven by steam engines. Triple expansion steam engines arrived in the 1880s and turbines from 1900. Speed increased from 7 knots per hour in 1833 to 25 knots per hour in 1907, and fuel consumption from around 20 tons a day to 1,000 tons a day.”

It is possible that such technological impacts can be identified as waves in the history of shipping development, waves of technology.[5]

In the 20^th century and today in the 21^st century can we identify such rapid technology impacts on shipping that could be described as waves.

The 1950’s and 1960’s might meet such criteria and I shall call that period one of “traditional navigational and propulsion method change”.

Prior to this period two technologies had already influenced ship navigation. Developed in the early part of the century, the Second World war accelerated their implementation.

The gyro compass replaced the magnetic compass and provided a reliable means to ascertain true north unlike the magnetic compass.

RADAR had been in development for some time but in the 1940’s the first commercial ships had this alternative means to detect maritime traffic and land[6]

So by the 1950’s seafarers were already using technological navigational alternatives to traditional methods. However they were not always welcome. A personal history supports this.

[7]

In thick fog in the Dover Strait as a newly certified third officer I was radar plotting. The radar was a screen that displayed “blips” representing ships within a 10 to 12 nautical miles distance. Radar plotting [8]involved measuring the relative angle from the ships heading and the blips distance on the radar and transferring the information to a radial paper plotting sheet. Doing this enabled me to report to the captain the potential risk from ships around us. I remember being very proud of my inputs to this serious hazardous navigation exercise. Not so the captain. “Stop playing with that new-fangled gadget and get out onto the wing of the bridge with binoculars and keep a proper lookout!! Suitably chastised I resumed my traditional watch-keeping role.

There is a clear implication in that little episode. There are consequences in implementing new technologies on ships, not least that all involved officers are suitably trained! I will return to this later.

Shifting maritime technology

[9]The Norwegian Maritime Museum mounted an exhibition, a part of which highlighted the technological changes of the 1950’s and 1960’s.

A series of six stations depicted the technological changes that have affected the mariner’s work.

1.       From mechanical controls of the ship to electronic joysticks and dynamic positioning

2.       From sextant to GPS

3.       [10]

From conventional propeller and rudder to azipod and thrusters

 

 

 

4.       [11]From paper charts to ECDIS

5.       From radio to satellite phone

6.       A shift from general cargo vessels to specialised ships.

all were described and illustrated in a series of physical objects and visitor-controlled screens.

Collectively, these technological changes have radically changed the work of the ship’s officer.

1.       Out with the ships mechanical telegraph, in with direct motor control from the bridge and unmanned engine rooms.

2.       Out with celestial navigation and irregular ship position fixing, in with constant knowledge of where you were.

3.       Out with rudders and fixed propellers and in with multiple azimuth system rotating propellors

4.       Out with paper charts and the chart room. In with constantly updated electronic charts.

5.       Out with short wave radio communication and in with VHF and satellite communication.

6.       Out with derricks and cargo handling, in with container and ro-ro ships.

The broader ramifications of such changes were huge effecting changing roles at sea and a new demand for training.

·         Many ships no longer needed harbour tugs to berth as they could manoeuvre themselves.

·         Port facilities had to adapt to larger specialised ships with new loading and storing facilities.

·         The need for high voltage maintenance on board ship for the azimuth propulsion system required a new engineer officer, the Electrical Officer.

 

These are just a few examples of the ramifications of that wave of maritime technology in the 1960’s had and placed a huge demand for training from authorities and shipping companies.

Now in the 2020’s looking forward to the 2040’s many believe we are on the edge of a new wave of technology in shipping.

Spurred on by the need to reduce fossil fuels in ships and the increasing integration of ship and shore in a global digital network the future looks evermore digital.

Digitalisation and decarbonisation were identified by DNV[12] as major drivers for change incorporating a range of new technologies into maritime activities.

The World Maritime University [13]identified some of the technologies that we can expect in the future.

“The use of smart and digital ships is currently expanding and will grow even further with the wider utilization of technologies such as AI, digitalization, machine learning and mature semantic and cognitive technologies. The future ship will be smarter; data-driven; greener due to flexible powering options; and offer full onboard Wi-Fi and digital connections through global satellites and mobile communications”.

The consequences of these new technologies on seafarer training and competence we will address in a new articles.

 

References

‘Azipod - Google Search’. Accessed 1 February 2024. https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=ba846a2fd35e5017&sxsrf=ACQVn09Ltio3-RdzfrnzYV36xY0rDAW0oA:1706782371347&q=azipod&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwibyM_n84mEAxWCPxAIHZIUDqoQ0pQJegQICxAB&biw=1121&bih=478&dpr=1.1#imgrc=U1etSuxAGKgL9M.

DNV. ‘Competence Certification’. Accessed 28 January 2024. https://www.dnv.com/Default.

‘DNV_Future_of_Seafarers_Report_web (1).Pdf’, n.d.

‘Dynamic Positioning - Google Search’. Accessed 1 February 2024. https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=ba846a2fd35e5017&sxsrf=ACQVn09dRdkZLQAC46tLemfL_pparDPbmA:1706782275142&q=dynamic+positioning&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwihzN-584mEAxXCPxAIHYdLAHgQ0pQJegQIDRAB&biw=1121&bih=478&dpr=1.1#imgrc=CffvuCj4orJtBM.

‘Ecdis - Google Search’. Accessed 1 February 2024. https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=ba846a2fd35e5017&sxsrf=ACQVn0-AAyEGljsNAH8v-UEFQQaiz6_YnA:1706782528177&q=ecdis&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwip3bOy9ImEAxVyGhAIHemcAdgQ0pQJegQIDRAB&biw=1121&bih=478&dpr=1.1#imgrc=jKXgj2AO3EHRZM.

‘Green Radar Screen - Google Search’. Accessed 1 February 2024. https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=ba846a2fd35e5017&sxsrf=ACQVn09IrGm7V92r9Quo22jQkD_vhj8e8g:1706782943017&q=green+radar+screen&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAu5v49YmEAxUPFBAIHbMtBQ4Q0pQJegQICxAB&biw=1121&bih=478&dpr=1.1#imgrc=ajtk46IDIc2MFM.

‘Maritime History’. In Wikipedia, 26 January 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maritime_history&oldid=1199162693.

‘Maritime Timeline’. In Wikipedia, 22 September 2023. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maritime_timeline&oldid=1176623803.

Quora. ‘When Was Radar First Used on Civilian Ships?’ Accessed 28 January 2024. https://www.quora.com/When-was-radar-first-used-on-civilian-ships.

‘Ship - Navigation, Seafaring, Exploration | Britannica’. Accessed 26 January 2024. https://www.britannica.com/technology/ship/History-of-ships.

‘Shipping, Technological Change | Encyclopedia.Com’. Accessed 26 January 2024. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/news-wires-white-papers-and-books/shipping-technological-change.

Stopford, Martin. Maritime Economics. page 29-30. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://asp.bibliotekservice.no/sjofart/title.aspx?tkey=55207.

The Maritime Executive. ‘How Radar for Merchant Ships Developed’. Accessed 28 January 2024. https://maritime-executive.com/blog/how-radar-for-merchant-ships-developed.

World Maritime University, Aykut Ölçer, Momoko Kitada, Khanssa Lagdami, Fabio Ballini, Anas Alamoush, and Peyman Ghaforian Masodzadeh. ‘Transport 2040 : Impact of Technology on Seafarers - The Future of Work’. World Maritime University, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21677/230613.

 

 

 

 

---

[1] ‘Maritime History’.

[2] ‘Maritime Timeline’.

[3] ‘Ship - Navigation, Seafaring, Exploration | Britannica’.

[4] Stopford, Martin, Maritime Economics.

[5] ‘Shipping, Technological Change | Encyclopedia.Com’.

[6] ‘When Was Radar First Used on Civilian Ships?’

[7] ‘Green Radar Screen - Google Search’.

[8] ‘How Radar for Merchant Ships Developed’.

[9] ‘Dynamic Positioning - Google Search’.

[10] ‘Azipod - Google Search’.

[11] ‘Ecdis - Google Search’.

[12] ‘DNV_Future_of_Seafarers_Report_web (1).Pdf’.

[13] World Maritime University et al., ‘Transport 2040’.